Alaya Legal

Orders and Judgments Duration July 08-22, 2019

Home / Articles

Orders and Judgments Duration July 08-22, 2019

“THE ACHIEVEMENT OF JUSTICE IS AN ENDLESS PROCESS.”

JOHN F. KENNEDY, 35TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Hemlata Verma v. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co Ltd & Anr

Consumer Commissions should adopt liberal approach in condonation of delay matters – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court reiterated that Consumer Commissions should adopt a liberal approach while considering applications for condonation of delay.

The Court set aside the NCDRC order which had refused to condone a delay of 207 days in filing a revision petition.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Lafarge Dealers Association and Others

Inter-state sales between successor states cannot be treated as intra-state sales – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court observed that after state reorganization, inter-state sales between successor states must be treated as inter-state transactions.

The Court emphasized that the creation of a new political state must be given complete legal effect.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Libra Automotives Private Limited v. BMW India Private Limited & Anr

Courts cannot rewrite arbitration agreements – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that while exercising powers under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Courts cannot recast contractual terms or direct composite arbitration contrary to agreed procedures.

The Court emphasized strict adherence to arbitration clauses agreed upon by parties.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Pam Developments Private Ltd v. State of West Bengal

Government not entitled to special treatment in stay of arbitral award proceedings – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the Government cannot claim exceptional treatment while seeking stay of arbitral awards under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

The Court clarified that government entities stand on equal footing with private litigants in arbitration matters.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Sopan (dead) through His L R v. Syed Nabi

Sale with condition of retransfer does not automatically become mortgage – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court reiterated that a sale deed containing a mere condition for retransfer cannot automatically be treated as a mortgage by conditional sale.

The Court clarified that where sale and repurchase agreements are embodied in separate documents, the transaction ordinarily remains a sale.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

RB Dealers Private Limited v. The Metro Railway, Kolkata

Solatium under RFCTLARR Act calculated only on market value and attached assets – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that solatium under Section 30 of the RFCTLARR Act must be calculated only on market value and value of assets attached to the land.

The Court clarified computation principles relating to compensation in land acquisition matters.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Sterling Industries v. Jayprakash Associates Ltd & Ors

Arbitral awards cannot be challenged through writ jurisdiction – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court reiterated that arbitral awards cannot be set aside by High Courts through exercise of writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

The Court emphasized the limited judicial interference permissible under arbitration law.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

CORPORATE

IDBI Bank Limited v. Siva Industries and Holdings Limited

NCLT admits insolvency proceedings against Siva Industries

The NCLT Chennai Bench admitted insolvency proceedings against Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd for alleged default of ₹130.30 crore.

The proceedings arose from failure to discharge obligations as guarantor for loans extended to another entity.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

State v. Khimji Bhai Jadeja

Separate cheating transactions cannot be clubbed into single FIR – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that separate acts of cheating involving multiple investors constitute independent transactions and cannot be clubbed into a single FIR.

The Court clarified procedural safeguards in large-scale investor fraud cases.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Union of India v. Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Ltd & Ors

Pension and provident funds to receive priority repayment in IL&FS matter – NCLAT

The NCLAT held that pension and provident funds invested in IL&FS entities must receive priority repayment irrespective of company categorization.

The Tribunal protected employee welfare dues during ongoing restructuring proceedings.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

The Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Supreme Court observations binding even beyond strict ratio decidendi

The Supreme Court held that its pronouncements remain binding on High Courts even where they may not strictly form part of the ratio decidendi.

The Court further clarified treatment of capital receipts under taxation law.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
Read More

Mr S Gopakumar Nair & Smt. Asha Devi v. OBO Bettermann India Private Limited & OBO Bettermann Holdings

Minority share purchase under Section 236 restricted to specific circumstances – NCLAT

The NCLAT held that compulsory purchase of minority shareholding under Section 236 of the Companies Act applies only in circumstances similar to amalgamation, share exchange or conversion of securities.

The Tribunal also ruled that cancellation of minority shares requires valuation by a registered valuer.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

COMPETITION

Consumer Educational and Research Society & Ms Parul Choudhary v. Union of India, Ministry of Railways & IRCTC

CCI dismisses complaint against Railways and IRCTC regarding refund policies

The Competition Commission of India dismissed allegations of abuse of dominant position concerning railway fare refund policies.

However, the Commission suggested that Indian Railways review existing refund rules to improve consumer convenience.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

CCI E-Commerce Policy Consultation

CCI initiates stakeholder discussions on e-commerce competition issues

The Competition Commission of India convened meetings with restaurant associations and consultants to discuss competition concerns in the e-commerce ecosystem.

The discussions focused on issues such as deep discounting, predatory pricing and market fairness for online platforms.

The full article can be accessed at:
View Details

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Dabur India Ltd v. Emami Limited

Delhi High Court refuses to restrain Emami advertisements

The Delhi High Court dismissed Dabur’s plea seeking injunction against Emami’s advertisements for Zandu Chyavanprashad.

The Court observed that judicial intervention should not unnecessarily stifle innovation and fair competition.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Amway India Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. 1MG Technologies Pvt Ltd & Anrs

E-commerce platforms restrained from selling direct seller products without consent

The Delhi High Court restrained major e-commerce platforms from selling products of direct selling companies such as Amway, Modicare and Oriflame without authorization.

The Court recognized contractual and trademark rights of direct selling entities.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

MRF Limited v. Metro Tyres Limited

Copyright protection extends fully to cinematograph films – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that cinematograph films enjoy copyright protection as original works and that infringement need not involve exact duplication.

The Court observed that copying essential and distinctive features of a film may amount to copyright infringement.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Tamil Nadu Bike Taxi and Carpooling Regulation Matter

Madras High Court restrains app-based bike-sharing and carpooling services

The Madras High Court directed that private companies should not facilitate bike taxi or carpooling services through mobile applications in Tamil Nadu until appropriate regulations are framed.

The Court emphasized the necessity of statutory regulation for app-based transportation services.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Avatar

alayalegal

Most Recent Posts

Reach out

Category

Tags

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India Rules do not permit law firms to solicit work or advertise. By clicking the ‘I Agree’ button, the Reader accepts that they are seeking information on their own accord. Alaya Legal shall in no way be responsible for any technical inaccuracies on this website, or for any actions taken or not taken based on the information contained herein or accessed through this website. Readers are advised to seek counsel from a qualified professional while dealing with specific issues.

By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as mentioned in this Cookie Policy .

The views appearing under various sections, including ‘Trending’, are solely those of the respective author. The author may be contacted by writing to Alaya Legal at contact@alayanew.instantlywebsite.com .

Nothing contained on this website shall be construed as legal advice. Readers are encouraged to obtain independent legal counsel for advice relating to their specific circumstances.