Alaya Legal

Orders and Judgments Duration May 23, 2019- June 07, 2019

Home / Articles

Orders and Judgments Duration May 23, 2019- June 07, 2019

“LAW IS EXPERIENCE DEVELOPED BY REASON AND APPLIED CONTINUALLY TO FURTHER EXPERIENCE.”

ROSCOE POUND, DEAN EMERITUS, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Abdul Kuddus v. Union of India and Others

Foreigners’ Tribunal decisions prevail over NRC inclusion or exclusion – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that decisions of Foreigners’ Tribunals declaring a person as an illegal foreigner would prevail over inclusion or exclusion decisions under the National Register of Citizens (NRC).

The Court clarified that tribunal findings are binding and authoritative in citizenship disputes.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Madan Tiwari v. Yashwant Kumar Sahu

Dishonour of cheques issued towards future liability covered under NI Act – Chhattisgarh High Court

The Chhattisgarh High Court held that dishonour of cheques issued towards discharge of future liabilities is clearly covered under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

The Court observed that cheques representing outstanding liabilities arising from loan agreements attract penal consequences upon dishonour.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

G Ramesh v. Kanike Harish Kumar Ujwal & Anr

Partnership firms fall within the meaning of ‘company’ under NI Act – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court clarified that the expression “company” used under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act includes partnership firms and associations of persons.

The ruling expanded the scope of vicarious liability provisions under the Act.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

P V Ramana Reddy v. Union of India & Ors

Supreme Court upholds arrest powers in GST evasion cases

The Supreme Court dismissed challenges against Telangana High Court rulings which upheld powers of authorities to arrest persons involved in GST evasion cases.

The Court thereby reinforced enforcement powers available under GST legislation.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Rajasthan High Court Driver’s Licence Matter

Rajasthan High Court directs withdrawal of licences issued to illiterate persons

The Rajasthan High Court directed transport authorities to withdraw driving licences issued to persons unable to read or write.

The Court further instructed the State Government to frame guidelines and take corrective action regarding such licences.

Surinder Singh Deswal v. Virender Gandhi

Section 148 NI Act amendments apply retrospectively – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that amended Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act applies retrospectively to pending appeals under Section 138.

The Court clarified that the provision applies even to complaints filed prior to the 2018 amendment.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Anil Kumar v. Devender Kumar & Ors

Omnibus issues in civil suits violate CPC provisions – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court discouraged framing of vague omnibus issues in civil suits, holding such practice contrary to Order XIV Rule 1(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

The Court observed that distinct material propositions must be separately framed for effective adjudication.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Shewantabai v. Arun & Anr

Will executed in favour of neighbour not suspicious merely for that reason – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the genuineness of a Will cannot be doubted solely because it was executed in favour of a neighbour instead of family members.

The Court rejected objections raised by the widow challenging the testamentary document.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

No GST on Duty-Free Shops Matter

Allahabad High Court rules GST not applicable at duty-free shops

The Allahabad High Court held that purchases made at duty-free shops located at international airport terminals are not subject to GST.

The Court observed that such goods never cross customs frontiers and remain outside taxable territory.

CORPORATE

Ericsson India Pvt Ltd v. Reliance Communications Limited

NCLT initiates insolvency proceedings against Reliance Communications

The National Company Law Tribunal admitted Reliance Communications into insolvency proceedings.

The Tribunal also allowed exclusion of 357 litigation days from the corporate insolvency resolution timeline.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

ICICI Bank Limited v. Hyderabad Ring Road Project Private Limited

NCLT dismisses insolvency plea citing duplicity of claims

The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed ICICI Bank’s insolvency application against Hyderabad Ring Road Projects.

The Tribunal observed that there existed duplicity in the lender’s claims and supporting records.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

MAIF Investment India PTE Ltd v. Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited & Others

NCLT has exclusive jurisdiction over company disputes – NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal reiterated that all company law matters, including complex and contentious disputes, fall within NCLT jurisdiction.

The Tribunal referred to Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 which bars civil court jurisdiction.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Director Remuneration ITAT Matter

Director remuneration based on experience not treated as dividend – ITAT

The Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that remuneration paid to directors in proportion to their expertise and experience cannot automatically be treated as dividend.

The Tribunal clarified that absence of linkage with shareholding is significant in determining tax treatment.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Hari Sankaran v. Union of India & Others

NCLT observations under Sections 241/242 relevant for reopening accounts – Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that observations made by the NCLT under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act can form the basis for reopening company accounts under Section 130.

The Court clarified the statutory conditions governing reopening of financial statements.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

COMPETITION

Monsanto Competition Probe Matter

CCI investigation reportedly finds abuse of dominant position by Monsanto

Investigations conducted by the Competition Commission of India reportedly concluded that Monsanto abused its dominant position in the genetically modified cotton seed market.

The inquiry examined allegations of excessive royalty charges imposed on seed companies.

The article can be accessed at:
View Details

CCI Approval of GSK-Pfizer Consumer Healthcare JV

CCI approves formation of GSK-Pfizer healthcare joint venture

The Competition Commission of India approved the formation of a joint venture between GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer for consumer healthcare products.

The proposed joint venture combined businesses with significant global sales turnover.

The article can be accessed at:
View Details

Mr Kanhaiya Singhal v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited

CCI dismisses abuse of dominance allegations against Indiabulls Housing Finance

The Competition Commission of India dismissed allegations that Indiabulls Housing Finance abused its dominant position through unilateral interest rate revisions.

The Commission observed that the housing finance market remained competitive and Indiabulls was not dominant.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

MPCDF v. MPCDA & Others

CCI imposes ₹74 crore penalty for anti-competitive pharma trade practices

The Competition Commission of India imposed penalties exceeding ₹74 crore on pharmaceutical firms and drug associations for anti-competitive trade practices.

The Commission found that mandatory NOC requirements for appointment of stockists restricted free trade and violated competition law.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Abhijit Mishra v. Government of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court seeks RBI response on Paytm Postpaid service

The Delhi High Court issued notice to the RBI and Paytm Payments Bank regarding allegations that Paytm’s “Post Paid” wallet service violated financial regulations.

The petition challenged the legality of lending-related activities conducted through the platform.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Raj Rewal v. Union of India & Ors

Architects cannot prevent demolition of buildings designed by them – Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that architects do not possess rights under Section 57 of the Copyright Act to restrain demolition of buildings designed by them.

The Court dismissed pleas relating to reconstruction of the demolished Hall of Nations and Nehru Pavilion.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Delhi High Court Online Gambling Matter

Delhi High Court declines interim ban on online gambling websites

The Delhi High Court refused to grant interim relief seeking immediate suspension of online gambling and gaming platforms.

The Court, however, sought responses from the Government regarding legality of such activities.

Teleecare Network India Pvt Ltd v. Asus Technology Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court restrains Asus from using ZEN and ZENFONE trademarks

The Delhi High Court restrained Asus Technology from selling or advertising products under the trademarks “ZEN” and “ZENFONE”.

The order was passed in a trademark infringement and passing off suit filed by Teleecare Network India Pvt Ltd.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator v. Acko General Insurance Ltd

Delhi High Court imposes ₹10 lakh cost on Policybazaar for concealment of facts

The Delhi High Court imposed costs of ₹10 lakh on Policybazaar for allegedly concealing material facts to obtain an ex-parte injunction in a trademark dispute.

The case involved keyword advertising and trademark usage through Google AdWords.

The Order can be accessed at:
View Details

Dr Rishi Dixit v. Preventine Life Care Pvt Ltd

TDSAT upholds compensation order in data theft dispute

The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that confidential data belonging to Preventine Life Care had been misused by a former employee.

The Tribunal directed payment of compensation along with interest for breach of confidentiality obligations.

The Judgement can be accessed at:
View Details

Avatar

alayalegal

Most Recent Posts

Reach out

Category

Tags

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India Rules do not permit law firms to solicit work or advertise. By clicking the ‘I Agree’ button, the Reader accepts that they are seeking information on their own accord. Alaya Legal shall in no way be responsible for any technical inaccuracies on this website, or for any actions taken or not taken based on the information contained herein or accessed through this website. Readers are advised to seek counsel from a qualified professional while dealing with specific issues.

By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies on your device as mentioned in this Cookie Policy .

The views appearing under various sections, including ‘Trending’, are solely those of the respective author. The author may be contacted by writing to Alaya Legal at contact@alayanew.instantlywebsite.com .

Nothing contained on this website shall be construed as legal advice. Readers are encouraged to obtain independent legal counsel for advice relating to their specific circumstances.